As you are
well aware, there are friends of Ranade who do not hesitate to describe him as
a great man and there are others who with equal insistance deny him that place.
Where does the truth lie? But this question must, I think, wait upon another,
namely, is history the biography of great men ? The question is both relevant
as well as important. For, if great men were not the makers of history, there
is no reason why we should take more notice of them than we do of cinema stars.
Views differ. There are those who assert that however great a man may be, he is
a creature of Time—Time called him forth, Time did everything, he did nothing.
Those who hold this view, in my judgment, wrongly interpret history. There have
been three different views on the causes of historical changes. We have had the
Augustinian theory of history, according to which history is only an unfolding
of a divine plan in which mankind is to continue through war and suffering
until that divine plan is completed at the day of judgment. There is the view
of Buckle who held that history was made by Geography and Physics. Karl Marx
propounded a third view. According to him history was the result of economic
forces. None of these three would admit that history is the biography of great
men. Indeed they deny man any place in the making of history. No one except
theologians accepts the Augustinian theory of history. As to Buckle and Marx,
while there is truth in what they say, their views do not represent the whole
truth. They are quite wrong in holding that impersonal forces are everything
and that man is no factor in the making of history. That impersonal forces are
a determining factor cannot be denied. But that the effect of impersonal forces
depends on man must also be admitted. Flint may not exist everywhere. But where
it does exist, it needs man to strike flint against flint to make fire. Seeds
may not be found everywhere. But where they do exist, it needs man to ground it
to powder and make it a delectable and nutritious paste and thereby lay the
foundation of agriculture. There are many areas devoid of metals. But where
they do exist, it needs a man to make instruments and machines which are the
basis of civilization and culture.
Take the
case of social forces. Various tragic situations arise. One such situation is
of the type described by Thayer in his biography of Theodore Roosevelt when he
says :
“There comes a
time in every sect, party or institution when it stops growing, its arteries
harden, its young men see no visions, its old men dream no dreams ; it lives on
the past and desperately tries to perpetuate to changed and new conditions he
falls back into the past as an old man drops into his worm-out arm-chair.”
The other
kind of situation is not one of decay but of destruction. The possibilities of
it are always present whenever there is a crisis. The old ways, old habits and
old thoughts fail to lift society and lead it on. Unless new ones are found
there is no possibility of survival. No society has a smooth sailing. There are
periods of decay and possibilities of destruction through which every society
has to pass. Some survive, some are destroyed, and some undergo stagnation and
decay. Why does this happen? What is the reason that some survive ? Carlyle has
furnished an answer. He puts in his characteristic way:
“No time need
have gone to ruin, could it have found a great enough, a man wise and good
enough; Wisdom to discern truly what the Time wanted, valour to lead it on to
the right road thither, these are the salvation of any Time.”
This seems
to me to be quite a conclusive answer to those who deny man any place in the
making of history. The crisis can be met by the discovery of a new way. Where
there is no new way found, society goes under. Time may suggest possible new
ways. But to step on the right one is not the work of Time. It is the work of
man. Man therefore is a factor in the making of history and that environmental
forces whether impersonal or social if they are the first are not the last
things.
Ranade, Gandhi And Jinnah - Speech By Dr. B. R. Ambedkar - Part 1
Ranade, Gandhi And Jinnah - Speech By Dr. B. R. Ambedkar - Part 3
Ranade, Gandhi And Jinnah - Speech By Dr. B. R. Ambedkar - Part 1
Ranade, Gandhi And Jinnah - Speech By Dr. B. R. Ambedkar - Part 3
Hi Dear,
ReplyDeleteI Like your blog..!
Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar was popularly known as Babashaheb Ambedkar they are a great man. "Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar life history" Through my blog, you will get an biography to Baba Shaheb Ambedkar in Hindi
Visit Now - http://babashahebambedkar.blogspot.com/
Thank You,,,